Name: Leslie N.
Foot to navel: 97 cm Navel to top of head: 63 cm Average: 1.577
Navel to chin: 45 cm Chin to top of head: 21 cm
Knee to navel: 48.5 cm Foot to knee: 46 cm
Name: Rodolfo R.
Foot to navel: 103 cm Navel to top of head: 68 cm Average: 1.547
Navel to chin: 46.5 cm Chin to top of head: 22 cm
Knee to navel: 54 cm Foot to knee: 53 cm
Name: Michael C.
Foot to navel: 110 cm Navel to top of head: 66 cm Average: 1.84
Navel to chin: 46.5 cm Chin to top of head: 18 cm
Knee to navel: 65 cm Foot to knee: 51 cm
Name: Omar T.
Foot to navel: 113.5 cm Navel to top of head: 67 cm Average: 1.687
Navel to chin: 50 cm Chin to top of head: 22 cm
Knee to navel: 62 cm Foot to knee: 56.5 cm
Name: Leslie E.
Foot no navel: 107 cm Navel to top of head: 58.5 cm Average: 1.81
Navel to chin: 43 cm Chin to top of head: 17 cm
Knee to navel: 53 cm Foot to knee: 49 cm
Throughout this activity, the goal was to see who was the most mathematically beautiful by taking some measurements and then finding the average. In the end, who ever was the closet to 1.618 or anyone who actually hit that decimal was the most beautiful. As I measured and then found the average I realized that the closest one was Leslie N. I think so she was the closest to being the "most beautiful".
I believe that the Fibonacci Beauty Ratio is not anything that should be considered when it comes to beauty. It seems rather stupid to me and just is not reasonable, everyone is beautiful in their own ways and this can just bring some people down. I do not think that people would use this method in order to see if a person was beautiful or not.
No comments:
Post a Comment